In an exciting T20 clash between Mumbai and Madhya Pradesh, the match saw Mumbai emerge victorious by 5 wickets with 13 balls to spare. Madhya Pradesh posted a competitive total of 174/8 in their 20 overs, but Mumbai chased it down comfortably with a well-paced 180/5 in just 17.5 overs. Let’s break down the MP vs Mumbai Final with detailed insights on the batting and bowling performances, as well as the critical moments that shaped the game.
Madhya Pradesh Batting Performance : MP vs Mumbai Final
Madhya Pradesh faced a challenging task of posting a sizeable total, and despite a few solid contributions, they fell short in building partnerships. Their innings featured a few significant individual performances but lacked consistency. Here’s a detailed look at the batting scores:
Batter | Runs | Balls Faced | 4s | 6s | Strike Rate | Dismissal |
A. Gaud | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 42.86 | c Atharva Ankolekar b Shardul Thakur |
H. Gawli (Wk) | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | c Suryakumar Yadav b Shardul Thakur |
S. Senapati | 23 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 135.29 | c Suryakumar Yadav b Shivam Dube |
Harpreet Singh | 15 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 65.22 | c Suryakumar Yadav b Atharva Ankolekar |
R. Patidar (C) | 81 | 40 | 6 | 5 | 202.50 | not out |
V. Iyer | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 188.89 | c Ajinkya Rahane b Suryansh Shedge |
R. Batham | 19 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 135.71 | c Suryansh Shedge b Royston Dias |
T. Singh | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | c Hardik Tamore b Royston Dias |
S. Shukla | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 33.33 | run out (Ajinkya Rahane) |
K. Kartikeya | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | not out |
Extras | 12 | (W 6, LB 6) | ||||
Total | 174 | (8 wkts, 20 ov) |
Fall of Wickets:
- 5/1 (A. Gaud, 1.3 ov)
- 6/2 (H. Gawli, 1.6 ov)
- 48/3 (Harpreet Singh, 7.4 ov)
- 54/4 (S. Senapati, 8.6 ov)
- 86/5 (V. Iyer, 12.1 ov)
- 142/6 (R. Batham, 17.3 ov)
- 142/7 (T. Singh, 17.4 ov)
- 156/8 (S. Shukla, 18.6 ov)
Madhya Pradesh’s top-order crumbled early, with only R. Patidar’s (81 off 40) effort providing stability in the middle. His counter-attacking knock, including 6 fours and 5 sixes, was the highlight of the innings. However, contributions from the other batters were either too little or too late.
Mumbai Bowling Performance : MP vs Mumbai Final
Mumbai’s bowlers did a stellar job in restricting Madhya Pradesh. The wickets were spread across the bowlers, with Shardul Thakur and Royston Dias being the key contributors. Here is a breakdown of the bowling performance:
Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs Given | Wickets | Economy Rate |
A. Ankolekar | 4.0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 4.75 |
S. Thakur | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 2 | 10.25 |
R. Dias | 3.0 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 10.67 |
T. Kotian | 2.0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 8.50 |
S. Dube | 4.0 | 0 | 27 | 1 | 6.75 |
S. Shedge | 3.0 | 0 | 32 | 1 | 10.67 |
The standout bowler was Shardul Thakur, who bagged 2 wickets for 41 runs, while Royston Dias also took 2 wickets. The others, including S. Dube and A. Ankolekar, supported well by containing runs in the middle overs.
Mumbai Batting Performance
Mumbai chased down the target with ease, led by their skipper Suryakumar Yadav, who remained unbeaten at 1* off 35 balls. Despite a few early wickets, Mumbai’s chase was built around solid partnerships. Here’s a look at their batting performance:
Batter | Runs | Balls Faced | 4s | 6s | Strike Rate | Dismissal |
P. Shaw | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 166.67 | c Rahul Batham b Tripuresh Singh |
A. Rahane | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 127.59 | c Rahul Batham b Venkatesh Iyer |
S. Iyer (C) | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 177.78 | c Rajat Patidar b Tripuresh Singh |
S. Yadav | 1 | 35 | 4 | 3 | 137.14 | not out |
A. Ankolekar | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 266.67 | not out |
S. Shedge | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 240.00 | not out |
Fall of Wickets:
- 15/1 (P. Shaw, 1.4 ov)
- 47/2 (S. Iyer, 4.5 ov)
- 99/3 (A. Rahane, 11.4 ov)
- 121/4 (S. Dube, 13.1 ov)
Mumbai’s batting was defined by quick-fire knocks. The early departure of P. Shaw (10 off 6), followed by A. Rahane’s short stay (30 runs off 4 balls), put some pressure on Mumbai, but the consistent acceleration by Suryakumar Yadav (1*) and Ankolekar (16 off 6) kept the chase on track.
Madhya Pradesh Bowling Performance
While Madhya Pradesh’s bowlers put in a solid effort, their task was made difficult by the brisk run rate required by Mumbai. Here’s how their bowlers performed:
Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs Given | Wickets | Economy Rate |
A. Khan | 1.0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 9.00 |
T. Singh | 2.5 | 0 | 34 | 2 | 12.00 |
S. Shukla | 3.0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 7.33 |
R. Batham | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.00 |
K. Kartikeya | 4.0 | 0 | 39 | 1 | 9.75 |
Madhya Pradesh’s bowling was led by T. Singh, who bagged 2 wickets but went for 34 runs in just 2.5 overs, giving an economy rate of 12.00. S. Shukla was the most economical with 1 for 22 in 3 overs.
Conclusion
In this thrilling encounter, Mumbai successfully chased down Madhya Pradesh’s total, proving their superiority with a controlled chase. Madhya Pradesh, despite a fighting total and some individual brilliance, couldn’t stop Mumbai’s chase, which was propelled by quick scoring and tactical batting. Mumbai’s win was built around solid contributions from their batters, including the likes of Suryakumar Yadav and Ankolekar, who guided the team home with 13 balls to spare.
Mumbai’s victory can be attributed to their discipline in bowling and steady batting, while Madhya Pradesh will look back at missed opportunities and poor partnerships in their innings. This match was another example of how crucial partnerships and momentum shifts are in the shortest format of the game.