Court Movie Review 2025: State Vs. A Nobody – A Thought-Provoking Telugu Courtroom Drama

Spread the love

 

Telugu cinema has always been known for its versatility, and Court: State Vs. A Nobody is a prime example of this. This latest courtroom drama, starring Priyadarshi, Harsh Roshan, Shivaji, Sridevi Apalla, and Sai Kumar, brings an intense legal battle to the big screen. Directed by Ram Jagadeesh and produced by Prashanti Tipirneni, the film highlights the misuse of legal provisions, caste-based discrimination, and the power of the judiciary.

With the film already in theatres, let’s take a deep dive into its story, performances, technical aspects, and overall impact.

Storyline: Court Movie Review

Court Movie Review : 'కోర్ట్' మూవీ రివ్యూ -

Set in 2013 in Visakhapatnam, the story follows Mettu Chandrashekar (Harsh Roshan), also known as Chandu, a watchman’s son who works hard to earn a living. In the same city lives Jabilli (Sridevi Apalla), a young student from a well-off family.

Their paths cross unexpectedly, and what begins as casual teasing turns into regular phone conversations. However, their growing friendship takes a tragic turn when Jabilli’s uncle, Mangapathi (Shivaji), a staunch casteist, discovers her presence in Chandu’s house. Enraged, Mangapathi falsely implicates Chandu under the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act, turning his life upside down.

With no one to defend him, Vijayawada-based lawyer Surya Teja (Priyadarshi) steps in. As an assistant to the senior advocate Mohan Rao (Sai Kumar), Surya is determined to fight the case. The film then delves into a gripping legal battle where Surya Teja struggles to prove Chandu’s innocence against a deeply prejudiced society.

Will Chandu get justice? What drives Mangapathi’s hatred? How does the courtroom battle unfold? These questions form the crux of the film.

Strong Points of the Film : Court Movie Review

1. Direction and Screenplay

Ram Jagadeesh, making his directorial debut, does a commendable job with the film’s screenplay and execution. The courtroom sequences are tightly written, keeping the audience engaged. His ability to balance legal intricacies with emotional storytelling makes the film stand out.

The director also succeeds in making the audience think about how caste bias and legal loopholes can ruin an innocent person’s life. The climax scene is a powerful commentary on legal awareness, emphasizing the need for a fair judicial system.

2. Stellar Performances

  • Priyadarshi as Surya Teja: He once again proves his versatility. His performance as the dedicated lawyer is outstanding, with perfect dialogue delivery and expressions that carry weight. His court arguments make the audience root for him.
  • Shivaji as Mangapathi: His portrayal of a caste-driven antagonist is chilling and realistic. He gives one of the best performances of his career, making the audience despise his character’s actions.
  • Harsh Roshan as Chandu: The young actor delivers an emotional and believable performance. His transformation from a carefree youth to a victim of false accusations is heartbreaking.
  • Sridevi Apalla as Jabilli: She brings charm and innocence to her role, making her interactions with Chandu feel natural.
  • Supporting Cast: Actors like Sai Kumar, Harsha Vardhan, Rajasekhar Aningi, and Surabhi Prabhavati lend credibility to their respective roles. However, Sai Kumar and Surabhi Prabhavati’s characters could have been given more depth.

3. Engaging Courtroom Drama

The second half of the movie is its biggest strength, with intense courtroom arguments that make the audience applaud at key moments. The battle between Surya Teja and the prosecution is well-written, though stronger verbal exchanges between Priyadarshi and Harshavardhan would have elevated the drama further.

4. Emotional Impact and Social Relevance

The movie effectively highlights caste discrimination and legal misuse, making it more than just a courtroom thriller. It raises awareness about the POCSO Act and how false allegations can destroy lives.

Weak Points of the Film : Court Movie Review

1. Pacing Issues in the First Half

While the courtroom sequences in the second half are gripping, the first half takes time to establish the story. The teenage love story between Chandu and Jabilli feels a bit repetitive, and some viewers might find it slow.

2. Minor Factual Errors

Since the film is set in 2013, certain details should have been more accurate. For example, elements like Ola bikes and the Kailasagiri ropeway appear in the film, but they weren’t available in that year. These are small but noticeable mistakes that could have been avoided.

3. Underutilization of Talented Actors

Despite having a strong supporting cast, actors like Sai Kumar and Surabhi Prabhavati don’t get enough screen time. Their characters could have had more emotional depth, which would have enhanced the film’s impact.

Technical Aspects

1. Cinematography and Visuals

Dinesh Purushothaman’s cinematography is commendable, capturing the courtroom sequences and emotional moments effectively. However, some background elements could have been more carefully chosen to match the 2013 setting.

2. Background Score

Vijay Bulganin’s music is a major highlight. The background score enhances the emotional weight of the courtroom arguments, making key moments more impactful.

3. Editing

Karthika Srinivas R’s editing is decent, but a tighter first half would have made the film more engaging. The screenplay by Ram Jagadeesh, Karthikeya Sreenivass, and Vamsidhar Sirigiri is strong in the second half but could have been crisper in the beginning.

4. Production Quality

The film’s production values are solid, reflecting the efforts of Prashanti Tipirneni in delivering a high-quality courtroom drama.

Final Verdict: Court Movie Review

Court: State Vs. A Nobody is a thought-provoking and engaging courtroom film that delivers powerful performances and a socially relevant message. While the first half takes time to pick up, the second half makes up for it with well-written legal arguments and emotional depth.

If you enjoy courtroom dramas with strong performances and an important message, this movie is a must-watch.

Pros:

✅ Engaging courtroom sequences
✅ Outstanding performances by Priyadarshi and Shivaji
✅ Emotional and socially relevant theme
✅ Powerful climax

Cons:

❌ Slow pacing in the first half
❌ Minor factual errors in the 2013 setting
❌ Underutilization of talented actors

Final Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)

With rarely explored legal themes in Telugu cinema, Court: State Vs. A Nobody stands out as a bold and compelling film. If you love courtroom dramas, don’t miss it!

 

Join us for Free prediction and More information about cricket join us on our Telegram channel

Similar Post

 

Dr. Gurpreet Kaur (Bhagwant Mann’s Wife) – Biography, Career, Marriage & More

Leave a Comment